[vb.net] What is the difference between And and AndAlso in VB.NET?

In VB.NET, what is the difference between And and AndAlso? Which should I use?

Interestingly none of the answers mentioned that And and Or in VB.NET are bit operators whereas OrElse and AndAlso are strictly Boolean operators.

Dim a = 3 OR 5 ' Will set a to the value 7, 011 or 101 = 111
Dim a = 3 And 5 ' Will set a to the value 1, 011 and 101 = 001
Dim b = 3 OrElse 5 ' Will set b to the value true and not evaluate the 5
Dim b = 3 AndAlso 5 ' Will set b to the value true after evaluating the 5
Dim c = 0 AndAlso 5 ' Will set c to the value false and not evaluate the 5

Note: a non zero integer is considered true; Dim e = not 0 will set e to -1 demonstrating Not is also a bit operator.

|| and && (the C# versions of OrElse and AndAlso) return the last evaluated expression which would be 3 and 5 respectively. This lets you use the idiom v || 5 in C# to give 5 as the value of the expression when v is null or (0 and an integer) and the value of v otherwise. The difference in semantics can catch a C# programmer dabbling in VB.NET off guard as this "default value idiom" doesn't work in VB.NET.

So, to answer the question: Use Or and And for bit operations (integer or Boolean). Use OrElse and AndAlso to "short circuit" an operation to save time, or test the validity of an evaluation prior to evaluating it. If valid(evaluation) andalso evaluation then or if not (unsafe(evaluation) orelse (not evaluation)) then

Bonus: What is the value of the following?

Dim e = Not 0 And 3

To understand with words not cods:

Use Case:
With “And” the compiler will check all conditions so if you are checking that an object could be “Nothing” and then you are checking one of it’s properties you will have a run time error.
But with AndAlso with the first “false” in the conditions it will checking the next one so you will not have an error.

In addition to the answers above, AndAlso provides a conditioning process known as short circuiting. Many programming languages have this functionality built in like vb.net does, and can provide substantial performance increases in long condition statements by cutting out evaluations that are unneccessary.

Another similar condition is the OrElse condition which would only check the right condition if the left condition is false, thus cutting out unneccessary condition checks after a true condition is found.

I would advise you to always use short circuiting processes and structure your conditional statements in ways that can benefit the most by this. For example, test your most efficient and fastest conditions first so that you only run your long conditions when you absolutely have to and short circuit the other times.

The And operator will check all conditions in the statement before continuing, whereas the Andalso operator will stop if it knows the condition is false. For example:

if x = 5 And y = 7

Checks if x is equal to 5, and if y is equal to 7, then continues if both are true.

if x = 5 AndAlso y = 7

Checks if x is equal to 5. If it's not, it doesn't check if y is 7, because it knows that the condition is false already. (This is called short-circuiting.)

Generally people use the short-circuiting method if there's a reason to explicitly not check the second part if the first part is not true, such as if it would throw an exception if checked. For example:

If Not Object Is Nothing AndAlso Object.Load()

If that used And instead of AndAlso, it would still try to Object.Load() even if it were nothing, which would throw an exception.

A simple way to think about it is using even plainer English

If Bool1 And Bool2 Then
If [both are true] Then


If Bool1 AndAlso Bool2 Then
If [first is true then evaluate the second] Then

The And operator will check all conditions in the statement before continuing, whereas the Andalso operator will stop if it knows the condition is false. For example:

if x = 5 And y = 7

Checks if x is equal to 5, and if y is equal to 7, then continues if both are true.

if x = 5 AndAlso y = 7

Checks if x is equal to 5. If it's not, it doesn't check if y is 7, because it knows that the condition is false already. (This is called short-circuiting.)

Generally people use the short-circuiting method if there's a reason to explicitly not check the second part if the first part is not true, such as if it would throw an exception if checked. For example:

If Not Object Is Nothing AndAlso Object.Load()

If that used And instead of AndAlso, it would still try to Object.Load() even if it were nothing, which would throw an exception.

In addition to the answers above, AndAlso provides a conditioning process known as short circuiting. Many programming languages have this functionality built in like vb.net does, and can provide substantial performance increases in long condition statements by cutting out evaluations that are unneccessary.

Another similar condition is the OrElse condition which would only check the right condition if the left condition is false, thus cutting out unneccessary condition checks after a true condition is found.

I would advise you to always use short circuiting processes and structure your conditional statements in ways that can benefit the most by this. For example, test your most efficient and fastest conditions first so that you only run your long conditions when you absolutely have to and short circuit the other times.

The And operator will check all conditions in the statement before continuing, whereas the Andalso operator will stop if it knows the condition is false. For example:

if x = 5 And y = 7

Checks if x is equal to 5, and if y is equal to 7, then continues if both are true.

if x = 5 AndAlso y = 7

Checks if x is equal to 5. If it's not, it doesn't check if y is 7, because it knows that the condition is false already. (This is called short-circuiting.)

Generally people use the short-circuiting method if there's a reason to explicitly not check the second part if the first part is not true, such as if it would throw an exception if checked. For example:

If Not Object Is Nothing AndAlso Object.Load()

If that used And instead of AndAlso, it would still try to Object.Load() even if it were nothing, which would throw an exception.

If Bool1 And Bool2 Then

Evaluates both Bool1 and Bool2

If Bool1 AndAlso Bool2 Then

Evaluates Bool2 if and only if Bool1 is true.

Interestingly none of the answers mentioned that And and Or in VB.NET are bit operators whereas OrElse and AndAlso are strictly Boolean operators.

Dim a = 3 OR 5 ' Will set a to the value 7, 011 or 101 = 111
Dim a = 3 And 5 ' Will set a to the value 1, 011 and 101 = 001
Dim b = 3 OrElse 5 ' Will set b to the value true and not evaluate the 5
Dim b = 3 AndAlso 5 ' Will set b to the value true after evaluating the 5
Dim c = 0 AndAlso 5 ' Will set c to the value false and not evaluate the 5

Note: a non zero integer is considered true; Dim e = not 0 will set e to -1 demonstrating Not is also a bit operator.

|| and && (the C# versions of OrElse and AndAlso) return the last evaluated expression which would be 3 and 5 respectively. This lets you use the idiom v || 5 in C# to give 5 as the value of the expression when v is null or (0 and an integer) and the value of v otherwise. The difference in semantics can catch a C# programmer dabbling in VB.NET off guard as this "default value idiom" doesn't work in VB.NET.

So, to answer the question: Use Or and And for bit operations (integer or Boolean). Use OrElse and AndAlso to "short circuit" an operation to save time, or test the validity of an evaluation prior to evaluating it. If valid(evaluation) andalso evaluation then or if not (unsafe(evaluation) orelse (not evaluation)) then

Bonus: What is the value of the following?

Dim e = Not 0 And 3

The And operator will check all conditions in the statement before continuing, whereas the Andalso operator will stop if it knows the condition is false. For example:

if x = 5 And y = 7

Checks if x is equal to 5, and if y is equal to 7, then continues if both are true.

if x = 5 AndAlso y = 7

Checks if x is equal to 5. If it's not, it doesn't check if y is 7, because it knows that the condition is false already. (This is called short-circuiting.)

Generally people use the short-circuiting method if there's a reason to explicitly not check the second part if the first part is not true, such as if it would throw an exception if checked. For example:

If Not Object Is Nothing AndAlso Object.Load()

If that used And instead of AndAlso, it would still try to Object.Load() even if it were nothing, which would throw an exception.

For majority of us OrElse and AndAlso will do the trick except for a few confusing exceptions (less than 1% where we may have to use Or and And).

Try not to get carried away by people showing off their boolean logics and making it look like a rocket science.

It's quite simple and straight forward and occasionally your system may not work as expected because it doesn't like your logic in the first place. And yet your brain keeps telling you that his logic is 100% tested and proven and it should work. At that very moment stop trusting your brain and ask him to think again or (not OrElse or maybe OrElse) you force yourself to look for another job that doesn't require much logic.

AndAlso is much like And, except it works like && in C#, C++, etc.

The difference is that if the first clause (the one before AndAlso) is true, the second clause is never evaluated - the compound logical expression is "short circuited".

This is sometimes very useful, e.g. in an expression such as:

If Not IsNull(myObj) AndAlso myObj.SomeProperty = 3 Then
   ...
End If

Using the old And in the above expression would throw a NullReferenceException if myObj were null.

A simple way to think about it is using even plainer English

If Bool1 And Bool2 Then
If [both are true] Then


If Bool1 AndAlso Bool2 Then
If [first is true then evaluate the second] Then

If Bool1 And Bool2 Then

Evaluates both Bool1 and Bool2

If Bool1 AndAlso Bool2 Then

Evaluates Bool2 if and only if Bool1 is true.

AndAlso is much like And, except it works like && in C#, C++, etc.

The difference is that if the first clause (the one before AndAlso) is true, the second clause is never evaluated - the compound logical expression is "short circuited".

This is sometimes very useful, e.g. in an expression such as:

If Not IsNull(myObj) AndAlso myObj.SomeProperty = 3 Then
   ...
End If

Using the old And in the above expression would throw a NullReferenceException if myObj were null.

Just for all those people who say side effects are evil: a place where having two side effects in one condition is good would be reading two file objects in tandem.

While File1.Seek_Next_Row() And File2.Seek_Next_Row()
    Str1 = File1.GetRow()
    Str2 = File2.GetRow()
End While

Using the And ensures that a row is consumed every time the condition is checked. Whereas AndAlso might read the last line of File1 and leave File2 without a consumed line.

Of course the code above wouldn't work, but I use side effects like this all the time and wouldn't consider it "bad" or "evil" code as some would lead you to believe. It's easy to read and efficient.

To understand with words not cods:

Use Case:
With “And” the compiler will check all conditions so if you are checking that an object could be “Nothing” and then you are checking one of it’s properties you will have a run time error.
But with AndAlso with the first “false” in the conditions it will checking the next one so you will not have an error.

Also see Stack Overflow question: Should I always use the AndAlso and OrElse operators?.

Also: A comment for those who mentioned using And if the right side of the expression has a side-effect you need:

If the right side has a side effect you need, just move it to the left side rather than using "And". You only really need "And" if both sides have side effects. And if you have that many side effects going on you're probably doing something else wrong. In general, you really should prefer AndAlso.

AndAlso is much like And, except it works like && in C#, C++, etc.

The difference is that if the first clause (the one before AndAlso) is true, the second clause is never evaluated - the compound logical expression is "short circuited".

This is sometimes very useful, e.g. in an expression such as:

If Not IsNull(myObj) AndAlso myObj.SomeProperty = 3 Then
   ...
End If

Using the old And in the above expression would throw a NullReferenceException if myObj were null.

Also see Stack Overflow question: Should I always use the AndAlso and OrElse operators?.

Also: A comment for those who mentioned using And if the right side of the expression has a side-effect you need:

If the right side has a side effect you need, just move it to the left side rather than using "And". You only really need "And" if both sides have side effects. And if you have that many side effects going on you're probably doing something else wrong. In general, you really should prefer AndAlso.

If Bool1 And Bool2 Then

Evaluates both Bool1 and Bool2

If Bool1 AndAlso Bool2 Then

Evaluates Bool2 if and only if Bool1 is true.

Just for all those people who say side effects are evil: a place where having two side effects in one condition is good would be reading two file objects in tandem.

While File1.Seek_Next_Row() And File2.Seek_Next_Row()
    Str1 = File1.GetRow()
    Str2 = File2.GetRow()
End While

Using the And ensures that a row is consumed every time the condition is checked. Whereas AndAlso might read the last line of File1 and leave File2 without a consumed line.

Of course the code above wouldn't work, but I use side effects like this all the time and wouldn't consider it "bad" or "evil" code as some would lead you to believe. It's easy to read and efficient.

AndAlso is much like And, except it works like && in C#, C++, etc.

The difference is that if the first clause (the one before AndAlso) is true, the second clause is never evaluated - the compound logical expression is "short circuited".

This is sometimes very useful, e.g. in an expression such as:

If Not IsNull(myObj) AndAlso myObj.SomeProperty = 3 Then
   ...
End If

Using the old And in the above expression would throw a NullReferenceException if myObj were null.

For majority of us OrElse and AndAlso will do the trick except for a few confusing exceptions (less than 1% where we may have to use Or and And).

Try not to get carried away by people showing off their boolean logics and making it look like a rocket science.

It's quite simple and straight forward and occasionally your system may not work as expected because it doesn't like your logic in the first place. And yet your brain keeps telling you that his logic is 100% tested and proven and it should work. At that very moment stop trusting your brain and ask him to think again or (not OrElse or maybe OrElse) you force yourself to look for another job that doesn't require much logic.