According to the R language definition, the difference between &
and &&
(correspondingly |
and ||
) is that the former is vectorized while the latter is not.
According to the help text, I read the difference akin to the difference between an "And" and "AndAlso" (correspondingly "Or" and "OrElse")... Meaning: That not all evaluations if they don't have to be (i.e. A or B or C is always true if A is true, so stop evaluating if A is true)
Could someone shed light here? Also, is there an AndAlso and OrElse in R?
This question is related to
r
logical-operators
boolean-operations
or-operator
and-operator
The answer about "short-circuiting" is potentially misleading, but has some truth (see below). In the R/S language, &&
and ||
only evaluate the first element in the first argument. All other elements in a vector or list are ignored regardless of the first ones value. Those operators are designed to work with the if (cond) {} else{}
construction and to direct program control rather than construct new vectors.. The &
and the |
operators are designed to work on vectors, so they will be applied "in parallel", so to speak, along the length of the longest argument. Both vectors need to be evaluated before the comparisons are made. If the vectors are not the same length, then recycling of the shorter argument is performed.
When the arguments to &&
or ||
are evaluated, there is "short-circuiting" in that if any of the values in succession from left to right are determinative, then evaluations cease and the final value is returned.
> if( print(1) ) {print(2)} else {print(3)}
[1] 1
[1] 2
> if(FALSE && print(1) ) {print(2)} else {print(3)} # `print(1)` not evaluated
[1] 3
> if(TRUE && print(1) ) {print(2)} else {print(3)}
[1] 1
[1] 2
> if(TRUE && !print(1) ) {print(2)} else {print(3)}
[1] 1
[1] 3
> if(FALSE && !print(1) ) {print(2)} else {print(3)}
[1] 3
The advantage of short-circuiting will only appear when the arguments take a long time to evaluate. That will typically occur when the arguments are functions that either process larger objects or have mathematical operations that are more complex.
&&
and ||
are what is called "short circuiting". That means that they will not evaluate the second operand if the first operand is enough to determine the value of the expression.
For example if the first operand to &&
is false then there is no point in evaluating the second operand, since it can't change the value of the expression (false && true
and false && false
are both false). The same goes for ||
when the first operand is true.
You can read more about this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short-circuit_evaluation From the table on that page you can see that &&
is equivalent to AndAlso
in VB.NET, which I assume you are referring to.
Source: Stackoverflow.com