[css] CSS selectors ul li a {...} vs ul > li > a {...}

ul > li > a selects only the direct children. In this case only the first level <a> of the first level <li> inside the <ul> will be selected.

ul li a on the other hand will select ALL <a>-s in ALL <li>-s in the unordered list

Example of ul > li

_x000D_
_x000D_
ul > li.bg {_x000D_
  background: red;_x000D_
}
_x000D_
<ul>_x000D_
  <li class="bg">affected</li>_x000D_
  <li class="bg">affected</li>    _x000D_
  <li>_x000D_
    <ol>_x000D_
      <li class="bg">NOT affected</li>_x000D_
      <li class="bg">NOT affected</li>_x000D_
    </ol>_x000D_
  </li>_x000D_
</ul>
_x000D_
_x000D_
_x000D_

if you'd be using ul li - ALL of the li-s would be affected

UPDATE The order of more to less efficient CSS selectors goes thus:

  • ID, e.g.#header
  • Class, e.g. .promo
  • Type, e.g. div
  • Adjacent sibling, e.g. h2 + p
  • Child, e.g. li > ul
  • Descendant, e.g. ul a
  • Universal, i.e. *
  • Attribute, e.g. [type="text"]
  • Pseudo-classes/-elements, e.g. a:hover

So your better bet is to use the children selector instead of just descendant. However the difference on a regular page (without tens of thousands elements to go through) might be absolutely negligible.