I've been writing some batch files, and I ran into this user guide, which has been quite informative. One thing it showed me was that lines can be commented not just with REM
, but also with ::
. It says:
Comments in batch code can be made by using a double-colon, this is better than using the REM command because labels are processed before redirection symbols.
::<remark>
causes no problems butrem <remark>
produces errors.
Why then, do most guides and examples I see use the REM
command? Does ::
work on all versions of Windows?
This question is related to
batch-file
coding-style
comments
James K, I'm sorry I was wrong in a fair portion of what I said. The test I did was the following:
@ECHO OFF
(
:: But
: neither
:: does
: this
:: also.
)
This meets your description of alternating but fails with a ") was unexpected at this time." error message.
I did some farther testing today and found that alternating isn't the key but it appears the key is having an even number of lines, not having any two lines in a row starting with double colons (::) and not ending in double colons. Consider the following:
@ECHO OFF
(
: But
: neither
: does
: this
: cause
: problems.
)
This works!
But also consider this:
@ECHO OFF
(
: Test1
: Test2
: Test3
: Test4
: Test5
ECHO.
)
The rule of having an even number of comments doesn't seems to apply when ending in a command.
Unfortunately this is just squirrelly enough that I'm not sure I want to use it.
Really, the best solution, and the safest that I can think of, is if a program like Notepad++ would read REM as double colons and then would write double colons back as REM statements when the file is saved. But I'm not aware of such a program and I'm not aware of any plugins for Notepad++ that does that either.
This page tell that using "::" will be faster under certain constraints Just a thing to consider when choosing
A REM
can remark a complete line, also a multiline caret at the line end, if it's not the end of the first token.
REM This is a comment, the caret is ignored^
echo This line is printed
REM This_is_a_comment_the_caret_appends_the_next_line^
echo This line is part of the remark
REM followed by some characters .:\/=
works a bit different, it doesn't comment an ampersand, so you can use it as inline comment.
echo First & REM. This is a comment & echo second
But to avoid problems with existing files like REM
, REM.bat
or REM;.bat
only a modified variant should be used.
REM^;<space>Comment
And for the character ;
is also allowed one of ;,:\/=
REM is about 6 times slower than ::
(tested on Win7SP1 with 100000 comment lines).
For a normal usage it's not important (58µs versus 360µs per comment line)
A ::
always executes a line end caret.
:: This is also a comment^
echo This line is also a comment
Labels and also the comment label ::
have a special logic in parenthesis blocks.
They span always two lines SO: goto command not working.
So they are not recommended for parenthesis blocks, as they are often the cause for syntax errors.
With ECHO ON
a REM
line is shown, but not a line commented with ::
Both can't really comment out the rest of the line, so a simple %~
will cause a syntax error.
REM This comment will result in an error %~ ...
But REM is able to stop the batch parser at an early phase, even before the special character phase is done.
@echo ON
REM This caret ^ is visible
You can use &REM or &:: to add a comment to the end of command line. This approach works because '&' introduces a new command on the same line.
There exists a comment style with percent signs.
In reality these are variables but they are expanded to nothing.
But the advantage is that they can be placed in the same line, even without &
.
The equal sign ensures, that such a variable can't exists.
echo Mytest
set "var=3" %= This is a comment in the same line=%
The percent style is recommended for batch macros, as it doesn't change the runtime behaviour, as the comment will be removed when the macro is defined.
set $test=(%\n%
%=Start of code=% ^
echo myMacro%\n%
)
A very detailed and analytic discussion on the topic is available on THIS page
It has the example codes and the pros/cons of different options.
This answer attempts a pragmatic summary of the many great answers on this page:
jeb's great answer deserves special mention, because it really goes in-depth and covers many edge cases.
Notably, he points out that a misconstructed variable/parameter reference such as %~
can break any of the solutions below - including REM
lines.
REM
(or case variations thereof) is the only official comment construct, and is the safest choice - see Joey's helpful answer.
::
is a (widely used) hack, which has pros and cons:
Pros:
Cons:
(...)
blocks, ::
can break the command, and the rules for safe use are restrictive and not easy to remember - see below.If you do want to use ::
, you have these choices:
(...)
blocks and use REM
there, or do not place comments inside (...)
altogether.::
inside (...)
, which are summarized in the following snippet:@echo off
for %%i in ("dummy loop") do (
:: This works: ONE comment line only, followed by a DIFFERENT, NONBLANK line.
date /t
REM If you followed a :: line directly with another one, the *2nd* one
REM would generate a spurious "The system cannot find the drive specified."
REM error message and potentially execute commands inside the comment.
REM In the following - commented-out - example, file "out.txt" would be
REM created (as an empty file), and the ECHO command would execute.
REM :: 1st line
REM :: 2nd line > out.txt & echo HERE
REM NOTE: If :: were used in the 2 cases explained below, the FOR statement
REM would *break altogether*, reporting:
REM 1st case: "The syntax of the command is incorrect."
REM 2nd case: ") was unexpected at this time."
REM Because the next line is *blank*, :: would NOT work here.
REM Because this is the *last line* in the block, :: would NOT work here.
)
Note that none of these styles are directly supported by the batch language, but can be emulated.
Inline comments:
* The code snippets below use ver
as a stand-in for an arbitrary command, so as to facilitate experimentation.
* To make SET
commands work correctly with inline comments, double-quote the name=value
part; e.g., SET "foo=bar"
.[1]
In this context we can distinguish two subtypes:
EOL comments ([to-the-]end-of-line), which can be placed after a command, and invariably extend to the end of the line (again, courtesy of jeb's answer):
ver & REM <comment>
takes advantage of the fact that REM
is a valid command and &
can be used to place an additional command after an existing one.ver & :: <comment>
works too, but is really only usable outside of (...)
blocks, because its safe use there is even more limited than using ::
standalone.Intra-line comments, which be placed between multiple commands on a line or ideally even inside of a given command.
Intra-line comments are the most flexible (single-line) form and can by definition also be used as EOL comments.
ver & REM^. ^<comment^> & ver
allows inserting a comment between commands (again, courtesy of jeb's answer), but note how <
and >
needed to be ^
-escaped, because the following chars. cannot be used as-is: < > |
(whereas unescaped &
or &&
or ||
start the next command).
%= <comment> =%
, as detailed in dbenham's great answer, is the most flexible form, because it can be placed inside a command (among the arguments).
It takes advantage of variable-expansion syntax in a way that ensures that the expression always expands to the empty string - as long as the comment text contains neither %
nor :
Like REM
, %= <comment> =%
works well both outside and inside (...)
blocks, but it is more visually distinctive; the only down-sides are that it is harder to type, easier to get wrong syntactically, and not widely known, which can hinder understanding of source code that uses the technique.
Multi-line (whole-line block) comments:
James K's answer shows how to use a goto
statement and a label to delimit a multi-line comment of arbitrary length and content (which in his case he uses to store usage information).
Zee's answer shows how to use a "null label" to create a multi-line comment, although care must be taken to terminate all interior lines with ^
.
Rob van der Woude's blog post mentions another somewhat obscure option that allows you to end a file with an arbitrary number of comment lines: An opening (
only causes everything that comes after to be ignored, as long as it doesn't contain a ( non-^
-escaped) )
, i.e., as long as the block is not closed.
[1] Using SET "foo=bar"
to define variables - i.e., putting double quotes around the name and =
and the value combined - is necessary in commands such as SET "foo=bar" & REM Set foo to bar.
, so as to ensure that what follows the intended variable value (up to the next command, in this case a single space) doesn't accidentally become part of it.
(As an aside: SET foo="bar"
would not only not avoid the problem, it would make the double quotes part of the value).
Note that this problem is inherent to SET
and even applies to accidental trailing whitespace following the value, so it is advisable to always use the SET "foo=bar"
approach.
After I realized that I could use label ::
to make comments and comment out code REM
just looked plain ugly to me. As has been mentioned the double-colon can cause problems when used inside ()
blocked code, but I've discovered a work-around by alternating between the labels ::
and :
space
:: This, of course, does
:: not cause errors.
(
:: But
: neither
:: does
: this.
)
It's not ugly like REM
, and actually adds a little style to your code.
So outside of code blocks I use ::
and inside them I alternate between ::
and :
.
By the way, for large hunks of comments, like in the header of your batch file, you can avoid special commands and characters completely by simply goto
ing over your comments. This let's you use any method or style of markup you want, despite that fact that if CMD
ever actually tried to processes those lines it'd throw a hissy.
@echo off
goto :TopOfCode
=======================================================================
COOLCODE.BAT
Useage:
COOLCODE [/?] | [ [/a][/c:[##][a][b][c]] INPUTFILE OUTPUTFILE ]
Switches:
/? - This menu
/a - Some option
/c:## - Where ## is which line number to begin the processing at.
:a - Some optional method of processing
:b - A third option for processing
:c - A forth option
INPUTFILE - The file to process.
OUTPUTFILE - Store results here.
Notes:
Bla bla bla.
:TopOfCode
CODE
.
.
.
Use what ever notation you wish *
's, @
's etc.
There are a number of ways to comment in a batch file
1)Using rem
This is the official way. It apparently takes longer to execute than ::
, although it apparently stops parsing early, before the carets are processed. Percent expansion happens before rem and ::
are identified, so incorrect percent usage i.e. %~
will cause errors if percents are present. Safe to use anywhere in code blocks.
2)Using labels :
, ::
or :;
etc.
For :: comment
, ': comment' is an invalid label name because it begins with an invalid character. It is okay to use a colon in the middle of a label though. If a space begins at the start of label, it is removed : label
becomes :label
. If a space or a colon appears in the middle of the label, the rest of the name is not interpreted meaning that if there are two labels :f:oo
and :f rr
, both will be interpreted as :f
and only the later defined label in the file will be jumped to. The rest of the label is effectively a comment. There are multiple alternatives to ::
, listed here. You can never goto
or call
a ::foo
label. goto :foo
and goto ::foo
will not work.
They work fine outside of code blocks but after a label in a code block, invalid or not, there has to be a valid command line. :: comment
is indeed another valid command. It interprets it as a command and not a label; the command has precedence. Which is the command to cd to the ::
volume, which will work if you have executed subst :: C:\
, otherwise you get a cannot find the volume error. That's why :;
is arguably better because it cannot be interpreted in this way, and therefore is interpreted as a label instead, which serves as the valid command. This is not recursive, i.e, the next label does not need a command after it. That's why they come in twos.
You need to provide a valid command after the label e.g. echo something
. A label in a code block has to come with at least one valid command, so the lines come in pairs of two. You will get an unexpected )
error if there is a space or a closing parenthesis on the next line. If there is a space between the two ::
lines you will get an invalid syntax error.
You can also use the caret operator in the ::
comment like so:
@echo off
echo hello
(
:;(^
this^
is^
a^
comment^
)
:;
)
:;^
this^
is^
a^
comment
:;
)
But you need the trailing :;
for the reason stated above.
@echo off
(
echo hello
:;
:; comment
:; comment
:;
)
echo hello
It is fine as long as there is an even number. This is undoubtedly the best way to comment -- with 4 lines and :;
. With :;
you don't get any errors that need to be suppressed using 2> nul
or subst :: C:\
. You could use subst :: C:\
to make the volume not found error go away but it means you will have to also put C: in the code to prevent your working directory from becoming ::\
.
To comment at the end of a line you can do
command &::
or command & rem comment
, but there still has to be an even number, like so:
@echo off
(
echo hello & :;yes
echo hello & :;yes
:;
)
echo hello
The first echo hello & :;yes
has a valid command on the next line but the second & :;yes
does not, so it needs one i.e. the :;
.
3)Using an invalid environment variable
%= comment =%
. In a batch file, environment variables that are not defined are removed from the script. This makes it possible to use them at the end of a line without using &
. It is custom to use an invalid environment variable i.e. one that contains an equals sign. The extra equals is not required but makes it look symmetrical. Also, variable names starting with "=" are reserved for undocumented dynamic variables. Those dynamic variables never end with "=", so by using an "=" at both the start and end of the comment, there is no possibility of a name clash. The comment cannot contain %
or :
.
@echo off
echo This is an example of an %= Inline Comment =% in the middle of a line.
4)As a command, redirecting stderr to nul
@echo off
(
echo hello
;this is a comment 2> nul
;this is another comment 2> nul
)
5)At the end of a file, everything after an unclosed parenthesis is a comment
@echo off
(
echo hello
)
(this is a comment
this is a comment
this is a comment
good question... I've been looking for this functionality for long too...
after several tests and tricks it seem the better solution is the more obvious one...
--> best way I found to do it, preventing parser integrity fail, is reusing REM:
echo this will show until the next REM &REM this will not show
you can also use multiline with the "NULL LABEL" trick... (dont forget the ^ at the end of the line for continuity)
::(^
this is a multiline^
comment... inside a null label!^
dont forget the ^caret at the end-of-line^
to assure continuity of text^
)
Another alternative is to express the comment as a variable expansion that always expands to nothing.
Variable names cannot contain =
, except for undocumented dynamic variables like
%=ExitCode%
and %=C:%
. No variable name can ever contain an =
after the 1st position. So I sometimes use the following to include comments within a parenthesized block:
::This comment hack is not always safe within parentheses.
(
%= This comment hack is always safe, even within parentheses =%
)
It is also a good method for incorporating in-line comments
dir junk >nul 2>&1 && %= If found =% echo found || %= else =% echo not found
The leading =
is not necessary, but I like if for the symmetry.
There are two restrictions:
1) the comment cannot contain %
2) the comment cannot contain :
Source: Stackoverflow.com